Home / How I Became An Oxfordian / Michael Schaefer: How I Became an Oxfordian

Michael Schaefer: How I Became an Oxfordian

It is a habit of mine to note, with each book I buy, the date of purchase on its first blank page. And so I know that it was in May of 2003 that I bought a copy of the “Neues Shake-speare Journal” from one of those stacks of used books outside a bookshop in my home town of Freiburg, in the Black Forest.  It was just curiosity, I had no idea what it was about, only that it was about Shakespeare, and ever since the days of my English studies I loved Shakespeare.

Michael Schaefer is a musician and writer who lives in South Germany (www.mike-schaefer.net)

Michael Schaefer is a musician and writer who lives in South Germany (www.mike-schaefer.net)

I had no idea that there was something like an authorship question; the topic had not been mentioned in the lectures I had attended at Freiburg University, 1977-1983. In retrospect, it is interesting to reflect on this happy, snug ignorance, on this “Is there a problem?!” attitude.

But of course I was soon to learn what was going on. In that little impressive volume I bought I read my first basic essays about the topic. I especially remember Robert Detobel’s “Über Shakespeares Authentizität und Tod” (“About Shakespeare’s Authenticity and Death”), because it was easily accessible as an introduction. I caught fire. Then, I was set ablaze by Mark Twain’s “Is Shakespeare Dead?”, which I read on the internet. There I also read excerpts of J.T. Looney’s work. His suggestion that Shakespeare must have been a pen name of Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, seemed plausible to me, and I embraced it intuitively.

Following that, I also came across the Shakespeare books of Joseph Sobran (Alias Shakespeare), Walter Klier (The Shakespeare Conspiracy) and Kurt Kreiler (The Man Who Invented Shakespeare). Kreiler’s book especially painted a very moving portrait of Edward de Vere. I read a lot on the internet also – just a few days ago I devoured Sir George Greenwood’s “The Shakespeare Problem Restated.” Greenwood was an early 20th authorship skeptic and prolific author. I could actually hear his voice and was delighted by his combination of friendly sarcasm and immense authority and scholarship. I also find his strict focus on refuting the Stratfordian theory only (“It was not the Stratford rustic!”) very strong and useful, although I still favour Oxford. Strategically speaking, it is maybe easier to tackle the Stratfordian fortress first and then move on to the positive answers.

Just a few weeks ago, I wrote an essay “Nieder mit dem FAKEspeare!” (“Down with the FAKEspeare!”), which was published on the website of the “Neue Shakespeare-Gesellschaft”.

In the end, I think it’s interesting to reflect once more on this chance event of myself coming across a used book in Freiburg and so learning that there is an authorship debate after all! Because I really think that the vast majority of people out there, even those with an interest in literature, have no idea that there is such a thing as an authorship question. They take the name magic, the name voodoo for granted: “Shakespeare is Shakespeare, who else could he be?”

— Michael Schaefer

“How I Became an Oxfordian” is edited by Bob Meyers. You may submit your essay on this topic (500 words or less in an editable format such as MS Word), along with a digital photo of yourself, to:info@shakespeareoxfordfellowship.org. Also include a sentence about yourself (e.g., “John J. Smith is a businessman in San Francisco.”).

You may join the SOF or renew your membership for 2016 at our membership page.

About Erik Eisenman

Stay Informed
Join our FREE Email list to get the latest news on the Shakespeare authorship controversy
No Thanks
Thanks for signing up. You must confirm your email address before we can send you. Please check your email and follow the instructions.
We respect your privacy. Your information is safe and will never be shared.
Don't miss out. Subscribe today.