The Legally Annotated HAMLET – Act One Scene 1
September 18, 2005
by Mark Andre Alexander Act One | Act Two | Act Three | Act Four | Act Five ACT ONE Scene 1 | Scene 2 | Scenes 3
SOF
The Legally Annotated Hamlet
September 18, 2005
by Mark Alexander. A scene by scene analysis of legal themes and allusions in Shakespeare’s Hamlet.
The Shakespeare “Signatures” Deconstructed
September 12, 2005
by Robert Detobel Fidelio: Here’s the pen, captain: your name to the sale. Captain: ‘S foot, dost take me to be penman? … Fidelio: Take
Shakespeare’s Self-Portrait: Charlton Ogburn’s Argument for Oxford
September 9, 2005
by Charlton Ogburn Jr. This essay was posted on the Shakespeare Oxford Society (now SOF) website on September 9, 2005, and represents an enlightening summary
Nelson, “Monstrous Adversary”: reviewed by Moore
September 21, 2004
Demonography 101: Alan Nelson’s Monstrous Adversary by Peter R. Moore Alan H. Nelson, Monstrous Adversary: The Life of Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford (Liverpool
Nelson, “Monstrous Adversary”: Five Reviews
September 21, 2004
The Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship (SOF) is pleased to offer five reviews of Professor Alan H. Nelson’s book, Monstrous Adversary: The Life of Edward de Vere,
Rebutting Reedy & Kathman, “How We Know Shakespeare Wrote Shakespeare”
September 12, 2004
by Lynne Kositsky and Roger Stritmatter September 12, 2004 In an undated internet essay by Mr. Tom Reedy and Dr. David Kathman, “How We Know
Shakespeare’s Legal Appeal “Kill All the Lawyers” Seen Through the Prism of Authorship
September 21, 2002
by Roger Stritmatter Kill All the Lawyers?: Shakespeare’s Legal Appeal by Daniel Kornstein. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. According to one prominent version of recent
Review of UNGENTLE SHAKESPEARE by Katherine Duncan Jones
September 20, 2002
By Ken Kaplan Deconstructing Ungentle Shakespeare: The Authorship Issue and Stratfordian Biography, Part I The great criticism, centuries old, of traditional Shakespearean biography has always
What’s in a ‘Nym? Pseudonyms, Heteronyms and the Remarkable Case of Fernando Pessoa
September 9, 2002
by Alex McNeil September 9, 2002 If there’s one thing Oxfordians can agree on, it’s that Edward de Vere used an alias as a professional
Shakespeare’s Censored Personality by Roger Stritmatter
January 31, 2002
By Roger Stritmatter A review-essay of Censorship and Interpretation: The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England,by Annabel Patterson. 1992. Hailed a decade
Review of Elizabeth Appleton’s AN ANATOMY OF THE MARPRELATE CONTROVERSY
January 31, 2002
By Roger Stritmatter An Anatomy of the Marprelate Controversy 1588-1596: Retracing Shakespeare’s Identity and that of Martin Marprelate by Elizabeth Appleton. The Edwin Mellen Press,
The Dedication to Strange News (1592)
October 7, 2001
Transcribed With Commentary by Charles Wisner Barrell. Reprinted from the October 1944 issue of the Shakespeare Fellowship Quarterly To the most copious Carminist 1
Unpacking Merry Wives of Windsor
October 7, 1999
by Robert Brazil Shakespeare’s play, The Merry Wives of Windsor, is filled with fascinating enigmas. The comedy, set in the environs of Windsor Castle, weaves
Michell, “Who Wrote Shakespeare?”: reviewed by Stritmatter
September 20, 1997
book review by Roger Stritmatter John Michell, Who Wrote Shakespeare? (London: Thames & Hudson, 1996). This review was originally published in the Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter,
Matus, “Shakespeare, In Fact”: reviewed by Whalen
September 20, 1994
book review by Richard F. Whalen Irvin Leigh Matus, Shakespeare, In Fact (New York: Continuum, 1994). This review was originally published on the Shakespeare Oxford
